A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights whilst respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. To the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided because of the decision on the Supreme Court within the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are missing in the present case. In these circumstances, this petition is found to get not maintainable which is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
The court emphasized that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity from the offense demands the most stringent punishment, contemplating the sanctity of human life and deterrence for opportunity offenders.
116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as set forth would not apply, as the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, rather he continues to be acquitted from the criminal charges based on evidence and it truly is properly-settled legislation that once the civil servant is acquitted from the criminal case, then on this quite charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment via the department and held him disqualified to the post because acquittal for all long run purposes. The aforesaid proposition has become set at naught by the Supreme Court of Pakistan from the case on the District Police Officer Mainwali and 2 others v.
The former means “guilty act” as well as the latter means “guilty mind.” With the omission from the intention, the commission from the act alone is not really adequate to gain a conviction for that crime. This is a simple principle that all regulation students are well acquainted with.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the regulation when it's unclear the way it applies to any supplied situation, normally rendering judgments based around the intent of lawmakers along with the circumstances with the case at hand. Such decisions become a guide for foreseeable future similar cases.
This is because transfer orders are typically thought of within the administrative discretion of the employer. However, there may very well be exceptions in cases where the transfer is enthusiastic by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more
73 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Concerning the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 in the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice will not be served, the grievance petition may be dismissed. This is because service with the grievance notice is usually a mandatory requirement and also a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law involves that a grievance notice be served on the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If your employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) When the organization is transprovincial.
Electronic and paper court records retained in the court site can be viewed in the courthouse for free, however there is a cost of 10 cents for every page to print from a public access terminal.
On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf from the boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, as well as therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf with the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advertisement litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for the dismissal based on absolute immunity, as they were all performing in their Employment with DCFS.
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a close-by electricity grid station as a consequence of opportunity health risks and dangers.
Thus, it had been held that the right to your healthy environment was part of the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article nine and 14 on the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all facets of human existence, all these kinds of amenities and amenities that a person is entitled to enjoy with dignity, legally and constitutionally.
PACER allows any individual with an account to search and Find appellate, district, and bankruptcy court case and docket information. Register to get a PACER account.
147 . Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and pay back fixation here are not entertainable to the reasons that such matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, along with the legal grounds for this petition are inadequate as a result this petition is dismissed, which will involve disputed claims and counterclaims on the subject post, therefore this court will not be in the position to dilate upon this kind of disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more
This section specifically relates to civil servants who will be rendered surplus because of the reorganization or abolition of a division, department, or office. Non-civil servants, by definition, will not be issue to the provisions from the Civil Servants Act. Their terms and conditions of service are typically governed by separate contracts or agreements with the employing organization. Therefore, the provisions of Section 11-A, including the possibility of being posted to another department, would not apply to non-civil servants. Read more